Skip to main content

ARTICLE

How Common Is Developmental Prosopagnosia? What the 3% Estimate Means

DeGutis et al. (2023) studied an online sample of 3,116 US adults aged 18–55. Using z-scores, 3.08% met criteria including mild DP, while 0.93% met stricter criteria. About 3% is not an established rate for Japan or the world.

The Long-Cited Figure of "2%"

Several earlier studies estimated the prevalence of developmental prosopagnosia, and a figure of roughly 2% has often been cited. That's not a small proportion, but because prosopagnosia itself isn't widely known, it has tended to carry an impression of being a "rare condition."

Estimates like this can shift depending on the number of participants, the region studied, and the method used to measure difficulty with face recognition. As research accumulates, prevalence estimates naturally get revisited.

Different Criteria, Different Estimates in the Same Sample

Published in Cortex in 2023, the study by DeGutis and colleagues assessed 3,116 US adults aged 18–55 online. With self-report and two face-recognition tasks, z-score criteria including mild DP yielded 3.08% (major 0.93% + mild 2.15%). About 1 in 33 is a rounded description of this sample under those criteria.

In the same sample, commonly used stricter criteria yielded 0.93%. Earlier estimates of about 2% used different samples and methods. The difference alone does not demonstrate an increase in prevalence or an update to a more accurate rate.

Individual Differences and Research Categories

Face-recognition ability varies between people. In this sample, DeGutis and colleagues did not find a clear natural boundary identifying people with DP. That finding does not settle whether DP forms a distinct category; the paper also calls for further research.

About 3% is an estimate of the proportion meeting particular research criteria. Changing the criteria changes the estimate. Major and mild refer to classifications based on test thresholds, not direct measures of how much difficulty someone experiences in daily life.

Reading the Numbers in Context

A voluntary online sample has limits to its representativeness. This percentage cannot directly tell us how many people in a school or workplace in Japan have DP. The study population and assessment method need to accompany the number.

An individual’s everyday difficulties cannot be judged from a study percentage alone. Rather than using the number to assess yourself or someone close to you, reflecting on the specific situations that are difficult can help you understand the experience.

References & Sources

The authors and organizations listed below are cited as sources for this content. This does not imply their review or endorsement of this article.

  1. 01
    DeGutis et al. (2023) — What is the prevalence of developmental prosopagnosia? (Cortex)

    Online study of 3,116 US adults. Z-score criteria yielded 3.08% including mild DP (major 0.93% + mild 2.15%), or 0.93% under stricter criteria. Estimates depend on the sample and criteria.

  2. 02
    Faceblind.org — About prosopagnosia

    A portal site introducing prevalence research and the concept of a spectrum for prosopagnosia.

This article is for general information only and is not a substitute for individual diagnosis or treatment. For the full list of references across the site, see the References page.